Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Resin-modified glass ionomer cementsÀÇ ÆÄÀý ¹× Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ½ÇÇèÀû ¿¬±¸

An Experimental Study on the Fracture and Shear Bonding Strength of Resin-modified Glass lonomer Cements

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 25±Ç 1È£ p.234 ~ 248
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÀç°ñ/Jae-Gon Kim ¾çöÈñ/¾È¼öÇö/³ë¿ë°ü/¹éº´ÁÖ/Cheol-Hee Yang/Soo-Hyeon An/Yong-Kwan Rho/Byeong-Ju Baik

Abstract

°á ·Ð
4Á¾ÀÇ resin-modified glass ionomer cementÀÇ ÆÄÀý ¹× °áÇÕ°­µµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ°í, º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø°ú
conventional glass ionomer cement¿Í ºñ±³Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ¿øÇü½ÃÆíÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÌÃà ±ÁÈû°­µµ
¹× ¿ìÄ¡¼ø¸é ¹ý¶ûÁú°ú »ó¾ÆÁú¿¡¼­ÀÇ Àü´Ü °áÇÕ°­µµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æÀ¸·Î °ü
ÂûÇÑ °á°ú, ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. Z 100ÀÇ ÀÌÃà ±ÁÈû°­µµ´Â °¡Àå ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, Fuji ¥± LC, Vitremer, Dyract ±×¸®°í
Compoglass´Â Fuji ¥±º¸´Ù Áõ°¡µÈ ¼öÄ¡¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù(P<0.05).
2. ¹ý¶ûÁú°ú »ó¾ÆÁú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àü´Ü °áÇÕ°­µµ ÃøÁ¤½Ã Z 100Àº Fuji ¥± LC¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ´Ù¸¥ ½Ç
Ç豺º¸´Ù À¯ÀǼºÀÖ°Ô ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, Fuji H LC ´Â Fuji ¥±º¸´Ù Áõ°¡µÈ ¼öÄ¡¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³ÂÀ¸³ª
(P<0.05), Vitremer, Dyract, Compoglass´Â Fuji ll¿Í À¯»çÇÑ ¼öÄ¡¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù (P>0.05).
3. Z 100°ú Fuji H LCÀÇ ¹ý¶ûÁú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àü´Ü °áÇÕ°­µµ´Â »ó¾ÆÁúº¸´Ù ³ô¾ÒÀ¸³ª(P<0.05),
Fuji ¥±, Vitremer. Dyract, Compoglass¿¡¼­´Â ¹ý¶ûÁú°ú »ó¾ÆÁú°£ÀÇ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù
(P>0.05).
4. Z 100°ú Fuji ¥± LC·Î ó¸®µÈ ¹ý¶ûÁú°ú »ó¾ÆÁúÀº ¸í¹éÇÏ°Ô ºÎ½ÄµÈ ¹ý¶ûÁúÇ¥¸é°ú µµ¸»
ÃþÀÌ Á¦°ÅµÊ¿¡ µû¶ó »ó¾Æ¼¼°üÀÇ ³ëÃâÀ» º¸ÀÌ´Â »ó¾ÆÁú Ç¥¸éÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture and shear bonding strength of
resin-modified glass ionomer cements with composite resin and conventional glass
ionomer cement.
Three kinds of restorative materials including a composite resin (Z 100), a
convention-al glass ionomer cement(Fuji ¥±), and resin- modified 91ass ionomer
cements(Fuji ¥± LC, Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass) were investigated in this study.
For measurement of fracture an(B shear bonding strength. disk samples of the
materials were prepared and cylindrical samples of the materials were bonded the flat
enamel and dentin surfaces according to manufactuer's instructions. All specimen were
determinated by using an Instron testing machine with a crosshead speed of 1 §®/min.
Then, each treated enamel and dentin surface was, observed by SEM.
The following results were obtained.
1. The hi-axial flexural strength of Z 100 was highest, and Fuji ¥± LC, Vitremer,
Dyract and Compoglass were significantly higher than Fuji ¥± (P<0.05).
2. The shear bonding strength of j: 100 on the enamel and dentin surface was higher
than other experimental groups except Fuji ¥± LC(P<0.05). Fuji H LC was significantly
higher than Fuji ¥± (P(0.05), but in the case of Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass were
similar to Fuji If (P>0.05)
3. The shear bonding strength of Z :100 and Fuji ¥± LC on the enamel surface were
highly increased as compared with dentin surface (P<0.05), but in the case of Fuji ¥±,
Vitremer. Dyract and Compoglass were not different between enamel and dentin (
P>0.05).
4. In the Z 100 and Fuji ¥± LC, obvious etched enamel surface and exposed dentinal
tubules according to remove of smear layer and smear plug were observed.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI